Ratings Key Rating Spread The Instrument   Read the article: The State Of Children's Software Evaluation-- Yesterday, Today And In The 21st Century	How We Rate Interactive Media: About the Ratings, and CTR's Software Evaluation Instrument Here's the evaluation instrument that we use to do our full-length reviews (below). If you're looking for an easy to print form to use with test families (especially good for video games, here's the Serious Games Testers Evaluation form, used by the Mediatech foundation. It is a PDF. Please keep in mind that these forms are copyrighted. If you use them, please attribute the source, and don't modify them without a proper reference. If you do use them and have a suggestion, please feel free to contact the author, Warren Buckleitner (warren at childrenssoftware.com). The six categories help you keep in mind what it takes to make a quality children's software title. This instrument favors software that is easy to use, child controlled, has solid educational content, is engaging and fun, is designed with features you'd expect to see, and is worth the money. To be safe, we recommend staying with a rating above 4 stars. CTR editors typically recommend programs that receive a 4.3 star rating or better. You can easily search for these titles in the Children's Software Finder (just enter 4.2 or greater for the rating search field. Some Interesting Facts About the Ratings The ratings are assigned by educators (CTR reviewers) who have been "trained" on the use of the instrument below. The word trained means that they have achieved inter-rater reliability when rating the same title independently. In cases when two reviewers come up with different ratings, a third reviewer is consulted, along with additional child testing until all raters "can sleep with" the rating. The system is not perfect; but it attempts to be the "least worst" rating system. In assigning ratings, the reviewers consider feedback from test schools and families. Key: 1=dud, 2=poor, 3=fair, 4=good, 5=excellent CTR's Checklist for Quality To get a program's 1-5 star rating, you need to do some simple math; a process that is automated for reviewers using the instrument, but is defined in detail here, for replication purposes. Add up the points in each category (always = 1 point, some extent = .5 points, never = 0 points, and N.A. = Not Averaged) and then divide by the number of items in the category. This number can then be converted to a 0 to 5 point scale. It is important to match the instrument with the type of software. In other words, you can't rate a program low in "Educational Value" if it is designed primarily as a game. Even though That's where the "N.A." category comes in. Finally, it is very important to consider the date that the review was written (in the Children's Software Finder, all you can do is check the copyright date, which is a searchable field). Remember that a highly rated program in 1993 might be equal to a poorly rated program in the context of current day software and hardware.For a more in-depth discussion of the art and craft of software evaluation, consult the article by CTR editor Warren Buckleitner: The State Of Children's Software Evaluation-- Yesterday, Today And In The 21st Century. TEACHERS & LIBRARIANS: PERMISSION TO COPY THIS PAGE IS GRANTED Children's Software Evaluation Instrument © 1998 Children's Technology Review I. Ease of Use (Can a child can use it with minimal help?) A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14  S. E. N. N.A. __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __  S. E. N N.A. Skills needed to operate the program are in range of the child Children can use the program independently after the first use Accessing key menus is straightforward Reading ability is not prerequisite to using the program Graphics make sense to the intended user Printing routines are simple It is easy to get in or out of any activity at any point Getting to the first menu is quick and easy Controls are responsive to the touch Written materials are helpful Instructions can be reviewed on the screen, if necessary Children know if they make a mistake Icons are large and easy to select with a moving cursor Installation procedure is straightforward and easy to do II. Childproof (Is it designed with "child-reality" in mind?) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Survives the "pound on the keyboard" test Offers quick, clear, obvious response to a child?s action The child has control over the rate of display The child has control over exiting at any time The child has control over the order of the display Title screen sequence is brief or can be bypassed When a child holds a key down, only one input is sent to the computer Files not intended for children are safe Children know when they've made a mistake This program would operate smoothly in a home or classroom setting III. Educational (What can a child learn from this program?) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ Offers a good presentation of one or more content areas Graphics do not detract from the program's educational intentions Feedback employs meaningful graphic and sound capabilities Speech is used The presentation is novel with each use Good challenge range (this program will grow with the child) Feedback reinforces content (embedded reinforcements are used) Program elements match direct experiences Content is free from gender bias Content is free from ethnic bias A child's ideas can be incorporated into the program The program comes with strategies to extend the learning There is a sufficient amount of content IV. Entertaining (Is this program fun to use?) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ The program is enjoyable to use Graphics are meaningful and enjoyed by children This program is appealing to a wide audience Children return to this program time after time Random generation techniques are employed in the design Speech and sounds are meaningful to children Challenge is fluid, or a child can select own level. The program is responsive to a child's actions The theme of the program is meaningful to children V. Design Features (How "smart" is this program?) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ The program has speech capacity Has printing capacity Keeps records of child's work "Branches" automatically: challenge level is fluid A child's ideas can be incorporated into the program. Sound can be toggled or adjusted Feedback is customized in some way to the individual child Program keeps a history of the child's use over a period of time Teacher/parent options are easy to find and use VI. Value (How much does it cost vs. what it does? Is it worth it?) Considering the factors rated above, and the average retail price of software, rate this program's relative value considering the current software market. Consider also any extra hardware attachments required to get full potential of the programming, e.g., a sound card, CD-ROM, etc. Poor Good __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ __ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Don't forget that this form is generic! To use it properly, you have to look at a lot of similarly designed products, and that the "NA" field is particularly powerful in the overall score.
Home | Children's Software Finder (TM) | Write A Review Subscribe to Children's Technology Review| About Children's Technology Review | Submit a Product Contact us Disclaimer and Copyright © 2007 Active Learning Associates, Inc. All rights reserved. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.